Then again interweb and spiderweb are built against semi current UXP code (same back end as pale moon) and have a ton of security updates and require far less ram than FF legacy and chromium.Īll I can say is try them all and see what fits your needs and machine specs. Pale Moon gets updated almost monthly and is pretty solid as well. I really like chromium legacy (even with the semi broken UI) as it just works for every site I've thrown at it. For web compat and extensions i'd lean towards interweb for 10.6.įor lion it's a toss up. So based on a users needs each browser has different positives and negatives.
Snowmonkey is based on 52esr and is limited to the thunderbird add-ons site.
SpiderWeb also based on 52esr/old uxp, is more locked down, but has less extension support. Interweb based on 52esr/old uxp, has the next best extension support, but is open to webrtc leaks. However, it's fast and supports a ton of extensions. Arctic fox gets regular updates and bug fixes, but it doesn't have as new of a rendering/java script engine. Just don't add anything which hasn't been updated in years. NOTE: This is a Wiki post, so feel free to add any others to it. S upports 10.6+ 10.9 to 10.15 (developer amended from 10.6+ to 10.12+, but 10.9, in an all-64-bit environment, might work here) Supports 10.4.3 Intel through 10.14 (i.e., includes all SL-capable Macs) The following is a list of known, up-to-date (or relatively up-to-date) and maintained web browsers, e-mail clients, and FTP clients, for Intel Macs with at least Snow Leopard support, then Lion and up.ĥ.9.2 supports 10.9 through 10.15 5.8.6 supports 10.7 through 10.14 Finding web browsers that are still usable on today’s web can be a chore for older versions of OS X.
0 kommentar(er)
